Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Alice in Wonderland -a movie vs book review


Posted: July 18, 2017




Listening to records and cassettes was luckily part of my childhood.  I remember raiding my mother’s collection occasionally, to find something good to listen to and one of those times I found a tape that changed my life.



It was called, “Lewis Carroll Soundshow, Through the Looking-Glass and Alice in Wonderland,” featuring Joan Greenwood as Alice.

Immediately the talented voice acting attracted my attention, but the words themselves opened my heart to a world I never knew before.  With the simple plot of a young girl named Alice steadily moving through an extraordinary place meeting off the wall characters, Lewis Carroll has been able to capture audiences of all ages for generations.  Listening to these tapes let me see that it could be fun to write, fun to read, and fun to imagine.

After I memorized most of the poems and conversations I heard from the tapes, I declared myself an expert in all things Carroll.  I received a beautiful pop-up book for a birthday present, purchased any TV/movie version I could find, and bought a complete collection of Lewis Carroll’s works.

I wouldn’t say I know every little personal detail about Carroll’s life, but I know enough to understand why he wrote the way he did.  He was socially awkward with people his own age and controversially at ease with young children, mostly girls.  He would often write whimsical letters back and forth to children that were friends of the family.  Critics today judge him harshly for odd photographs he took of them which he considered art.  His mind was unlike others of his time and this gave us the classics we know and love today.

I highly suggest everyone to pick up any one of Carroll’s books and dive right in.  (Everyone is different so one might enjoy Sylvie and Bruno.  I did not because since the author loved math, he used this work to display his abilities and frankly I found it boring compared to all the other wild adventures he wrote.)

Highly Suggested Poems to Read:

The Hunting of a Snark

The Pig Tale

Beautiful Soup

Father William

The Walrus and the Carpenter

Jabberwocky



To fully understand Carroll’s most famous works about Alice one must understand that two books were written just for her: Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking-glass.  The biggest shame, as a fan of the books, is watching giant movie makers, like DISNEY, butcher the entire story from start to finish.  The first book, Alice in Wonderland is all about playing cards and the second, Through the Looking-glass, is all about chess.  I recently had to explain to a friend that there were in fact four queens mentioned in the books.  The Queen of Hearts (a “playing card” character) is the most memorable, but the most pleasant is the White Queen (a “chess piece” character) who later turns into a sheep that sells merchandise at odd prices.

Favorite Characters from the Alice Books:

The White Knight

Humpty Dumpty

Cheshire Cat

Tweedle Dum

Tweedle Dee



I will briefly touch on the Disney cartoon version from 1951.  Yes, the movie is a classic and children will be able to remember it the rest of their lives, but it was a disappointment.  Most viewers agree that it was very fun to watch, but in the end when Alice loses her way and she starts to meet a group of very strange birds and creatures the movie takes a weird turn.  I am proud to announce that in fact that part of the movie is not ever once mentioned in the books.  Alice never complains about losing her way and feeling lost.  She never meets any birds like the ones that Disney took the liberty to create.  Very brash on the cartoonist’s part to try and create creatures of their own when the books are filled with so many to pick from.  It’s like trying to make a beautiful bouquet of real flowers and deciding to throw in a few fake ones.  It doesn’t make sense.  Yes, I did enjoy the 1951 version, but also wished Disney would have stayed truer to the books.

As for the 2010 and 2016 versions that recently have been released starring Johnny Depp, I cringe in despair.  I did enjoy the second one a little bit better, mainly because I became use to the creative liberties they took.

The main problem I had with the movies is how they lumped all the characters together.  In the books Alice meets them all one by one and none of them meet each other nor ever mention another.  The only character that sort of knows what is going on and has an omniscient awareness is the Cheshire Cat.  I will give credit to the artists that developed the smiling feline in the newer movies.  They nailed it.  The smile was perfect and his transitions from visible and invisible states was astounding.

I do understand that the movies meant for Alice to be grown up and that she misunderstood what she saw as a child, so that gave them free reign to change things the way they pleased.  Watching a big-headed Queen of Hearts storm around the screen was enjoyable, but watching a silly idea about a prophecy needing to be fulfilled by a slain Jabberwocky was annoying.  It is sad that to fill a theatre for a classic tale, the movie makers felt they had to include a battle scene including flames and chaos.
In conclusion, if you want a quick look into Carroll’s works and don’t want to get to know the amazing characters he created, then consider the new movies.  If you instead want to debate an egg, talk with flowers, and become a queen at the end, READ the books.  You won’t regret it!



-Beck
(Maybe you can decide which book is better, for I believe Through the Looking-glass is the best!)


With a unique voice Joan Greenwood played Alice unlike any before or after.